Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Technology Review #1 Emerging Application of Technology (Consumer or Business)

Technology Review #1 Emerging Application of Technology (Consumer or Business)

Post a Comment

Magazine well-nigh engineering science

MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review modern logo.svg
Editor-in-Chief Mat Honan[1]
Categories Science, engineering science
Frequency Bimonthly
Publisher Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau
Full circulation
(2011)		 161,529[2]
First issue 1899; 123 years ago  (1899)
Company MIT Engineering science Review[3]
State United States
Based in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Language English language
Website technologyreview.com Edit this at Wikidata
ISSN 0040-1692

MIT Technology Review is a bimonthly magazine wholly owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and editorially independent of the academy.[4] Information technology was founded in 1899 every bit The Engineering science Review ,[5] and was re-launched without "The" in its proper noun on April 23, 1998 under and then publisher R. Bruce Journeying. In September 2005, it was inverse, under its and then editor-in-chief and publisher, Jason Pontin, to a class resembling the historical magazine.

Before the 1998 re-launch, the editor stated that "naught will exist left of the erstwhile magazine except the proper name." It was therefore necessary to distinguish between the modern and the historical Technology Review.[5] The historical magazine had been published past the MIT Alumni Association, was more closely aligned with the interests of MIT alumni, and had a more intellectual tone and much smaller public circulation. The magazine, billed from 1998 to 2005 as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation," and from 2005 onwards as simply "published by MIT", focused on new engineering and how information technology is commercialized; was sold to the public and targeted at senior executives, researchers, financiers, and policymakers, as well equally MIT alumni.[5] [half dozen]

In 2011, Technology Review received an Utne Reader Contained Press Laurels for Best Science/Technology Coverage.[7]

History [edit]

Original magazine: 1899–1998 [edit]

Technology Review was founded in 1899 nether the name The Engineering science Review and relaunched in 1998 without "The" in its original proper name. Information technology currently claims to be "the oldest engineering science mag in the world."[eight]

In 1899, The New York Times commented:[9]

We give a cordial welcome to No. 1 of Vol. I of The Applied science Review, a Quarterly Magazine Relating to the Massachusetts Institute of Engineering science, published in Boston, and under charge of the Clan of Class Secretaries. Equally far as make-up goes, embrace, paper, typography and illustrations are in keeping with the strong characteristics of the Institution information technology represents. This mag, as its editors announce, is intended to be "a immigration house of data and thought," and, equally far as the Institute of Technology is concerned, "to increase its power, to minimize its waste matter, to insure [sic] among its countless friends the nearly perfect co-operation."

The career path of James Rhyne Killian illustrates the close ties between Technology Review and the Constitute. In 1926, Killian graduated from higher and got his first task as assistant managing editor of Technology Review; he rose to editor-in-chief; became executive banana to then-president Karl Taylor Compton in 1939; vice-president of MIT in 1945; and succeeded Compton every bit president in 1949.

The May 4, 1929 issue independent an article past Dr. Norbert Wiener, then Assistant Professor of Mathematics, describing some deficiencies in a paper Albert Einstein had published earlier that year. Wiener too commented on a cardinal'southward critique of the Einstein theory saying:

The pretended incomprehensibility of the Einstein theory has been used every bit capital by professional anti-Einsteinians. Without prejudice to the cause of religion, I may remark that theological discussions have non at all times been distinguished by their character of lucidity.

The historical Engineering science Review oft published articles that were controversial, or disquisitional of certain technologies. A 1980 issue independent an article by Jerome Wiesner attacking the Reagan administration'south nuclear defense strategy. The cover of a 1983 issue stated, "Even if the fusion plan produces a reactor, no one will want it," and contained an article by Lawrence Thousand. Lidsky,[x] associate manager of MIT'southward Plasma Fusion Heart, challenging the feasibility of fusion power (which at the time was often fancied to be just around the corner). The May 1984 effect contained an exposé about microchip manufacturing hazards.

In 1966, the mag started using a puzzle column started in Tech Engineering News a few months before. Its writer is Allan Gottlieb, who has now written the column for more than fifty years.[eleven]

Every bit belatedly every bit 1967, the New York Times described Technology Review as a "scientific journal." Of its writing style, author George 5. Higgins complained:

Technology Review, according to [and then-editor] Stephen [sic] Marcus... [subjects] its scientific contributors to rewrite rigors that would give fainting spells to the well-nigh obstreperous cub reporter. Marcus believes this produces readable prose on arcane subjects. I don't concur.[12]

In 1984, Applied science Review printed an article about a Russian scientist using ova from frozen mammoths to create a mammoth-elephant hybrid chosen a "mammontelephas".[13] Autonomously from beingness dated "April ane, 1984", there were no obvious giveaways in the story. The Chicago Tribune News Service picked it up as a real news particular, and it was printed as fact in hundreds of newspapers.

The prank was presumably forgotten past 1994, when a survey of "opinion leaders" ranked Engineering Review [v] No. 1 in the nation in the "virtually credible" category.[xiv]

Contributors to the magazine also included Thomas A. Edison, Winston Churchill, and Tim Berners-Lee.[15]

Relaunch: 1998–2005 [edit]

A radical transition of the magazine occurred in 1996. At that time, according to the Boston Business Journal,[16] in 1996 Technology Review had lost $ane.vi million over the previous seven years and was "facing the possibility of folding" due to "years of declining advertising revenue."

R. Bruce Journeying was named publisher, the first full-time publisher in the magazine'southward history. According to previous publisher William J. Hecht, although Engineering Review had "long been highly regarded for its editorial excellence," the purpose of appointing Journey was to enhance its "commercial potential" and "secure a prominent place for Engineering science Review in the competitive world of commercial publishing."[17] John Benditt replaced Steven J. Marcus as editor-in-chief, the unabridged editorial staff was fired, and the mod Technology Review was built-in.

Boston Globe columnist David Warsh[xviii] described the transition by maxim that the magazine had been serving up "old 1960s views of things: humanist, populist, ruminative, suspicious of the unseen dimensions of new technologies" and had now been replaced with one that "takes innovation seriously and enthusiastically." Former editor Marcus characterized the magazine's new opinion as "cheerleading for innovation."

Under Bruce Journey, Engineering Review billed itself as "MIT'due south Magazine of Innovation". Since 2001, it has been published by Engineering Review Inc., a nonprofit independent media company owned by MIT.[19]

Intending to entreatment to business leaders, editor John Benditt said in 1999, "We're really virtually new technologies and how they go commercialized." Technology Review covers breakthroughs and current issues on fields such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, and calculating. Articles are likewise devoted to more than mature disciplines such as energy, telecommunications, transportation, and the war machine.

Since Journey, Applied science Review has been distributed every bit a regular mass-market magazine and appears on newsstands. Past 2003, circulation had more than tripled from 92,000 to 315,000, near one-half that of Scientific American, and included 220,000 paid subscribers and 95,000 sent complimentary to MIT alumni. Additionally, in August 2003, a German edition of Applied science Review was started in cooperation with the publishing house Heinz Heise (circulation of near 50,000 every bit of 2005). Co-ordinate to The New York Times,[20] as of 2004 the mag was still "partly financed by M.I.T. (though it is expected to turn a profit somewhen)."

Technology Review also functions as the MIT alumni magazine; the edition sent to alumni contains a separate section, "MIT News," containing items such as alumni class notes. This department is not included in the edition distributed to the full general public.

The magazine is published by Engineering Review, Inc, an independent media company owned by MIT. MIT's website lists it every bit an MIT publication,[21] and the MIT News Office states that "the magazine often uses MIT expertise for some of its content." In 1999 The Boston Globe noted that (apart from the alumni section) "few Technology Review manufactures really concern events or research at MIT."[22] All the same, in the words of editor Jason Pontin:

Our chore is non to promote MIT; but we analyse and explain emerging technologies,[23] and because we believe that new technologies are, generally speaking, a good thing, we do indirectly promote MIT's cadre activity: that is, the development of innovative engineering.[24]

From 1997 to 2005, R. Bruce Journey held the championship of "publisher"; Journey was also the president and CEO of Technology Review, Inc. Editors-in-chief accept included John Benditt (1997), Robert Buderi (2002), and Jason Pontin (2004).

The magazine has won numerous Folio! awards, presented at the annual magazine publishing trade show conducted by Folio! mag. In 2001, these included a "Silvery Folio: Editorial Excellence Award" in the consumer scientific discipline and engineering magazine category and many awards for typography and design.[25] In 2006, Technology Review was named a finalist in the "general excellence" category of the almanac National Magazine Awards, sponsored by the American Society of Magazine Editors.[26]

On June 6, 2001, Fortune and CNET Networks launched a publication entitled Fortune/CNET Technology Review.[27] MIT sued[28] Fortune 's parent corporation, Time, Inc. for infringement of the Technology Review trademark.[29] The example was quickly settled. In Baronial the MIT pupil newspaper reported that lawyers for MIT and Time were reluctant to hash out the case, citing a confidentiality agreement that both sides described as very restrictive. Jason Kravitz, a Boston chaser who represented MIT in the case, suggested that the magazine's alter of proper name to Fortune/CNET Tech Review, a change that occurred in the middle of the example, may take been part of the settlement.[30]

Many publications roofing specific technologies have used "technology review" as office of their names, such as Lawrence Livermore Labs's Free energy & Technology Review,[31] AACE's Educational Engineering science Review,[32] and the International Atomic Energy Agency's Nuclear Technology Review. [33]

In 2005, Technology Review, along with Wired News and other engineering science publications, was embarrassed by the publication of a number of stories by freelancer Michelle Delio containing information which could non exist corroborated. Editor-in-primary Pontin said, "Of the x stories which were published, only three were entirely accurate. In two of the stories, I'm fairly confident that Michelle Delio either did not speak to the person she said she spoke to, or misrepresented her interview with him."[34] The stories were retracted.

Modernistic mag: 2005–present [edit]

On August 30, 2005, Technology Review appear that R. Bruce Journey, publisher from 1996 to 2005, would be replaced past the then current Editor in Chief, Jason Pontin, and would reduce the impress publication frequency from xi to six issues per twelvemonth while enhancing the publication's website.[34] The Boston Globe characterized the change as a "strategic overhaul." Editor and publisher Jason Pontin stated that he would "focus the print mag on what print does best: nowadays[ing] longer-format, investigative stories and colorful imagery." Technology Review's Spider web site, Pontin said, would henceforth publish original, daily news and analysis (whereas before it had only republished the impress mag's stories). Finally, Pontin said that Technology Review'due south stories in print and online would identify and analyze emerging technologies.[35] This focus resembles that of the historical Technology Review. Pontin convinced copy editors to prefer the diaeresis mark for words like "coördinate", a rarity in native English language usage, though failed to convince them to use logical punctuation.[36]

Without evident comment, the July/August, 2017, issue revealed a shift in top personnel, with Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau listed as Main Executive Officer and Publisher, and David Rotman as Editor.[one] Gideon Lichfield was named editor-in-chief in November 2017.[37]

In 2020, it was launched the brazilian version of MIT Engineering Review, known as MIT Technology Review Brasil.[38]

Every year, the magazine publishes a list of the 10 technologies it considers the most influential.[39]

Annual lists [edit]

Each yr, MIT Technology Review publishes iii annual lists:

  • Innovators Under 35 (formerly TR35)
  • x Breakthrough Technologies
  • 50 Smartest Companies

Innovators Under 35 [edit]

MIT Technology Review has get well known for its almanac Innovators Under 35. In 1999, and then in 2002—2004, MIT Engineering Review produced the TR100, a list of "100 remarkable innovators under the age of 35." In 2005, this list was renamed the TR35 and shortened to 35 individuals under the age of 35. Notable recipients of the award include Google co-founders Larry Folio and Sergey Brin, PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, Geekcorps creator Ethan Zuckerman, Linux developer Linus Torvalds, BitTorrent developer Bram Cohen, MacArthur "genius" bioengineer Jim Collins, investors Micah Siegel and Steve Jurvetson, and Netscape co-founder Marc Andreessen.[40] [41] The list was renamed Innovators Under 35 in 2013.

10 Breakthrough Technologies [edit]

2021 [edit]

Source:[42]

  1. Messenger RNA vaccines
  2. GPT-three
  3. Data trusts
  4. Lithium-metal batteries
  5. Digital contact tracing
  6. Hyper-accurate positioning
  7. Remote everything
  8. Multi-skilled AI
  9. TikTok recommendation algorithms
  10. Greenish hydrogen

2020 [edit]

Source:[43]

  1. Unhackable internet
  2. Hyper-personalized medicine
  3. Digital money
  4. Anti-aging drugs
  5. AI-discovered molecules
  6. Satellite mega-constellations
  7. Quantum supremacy
  8. Tiny AI
  9. Differential privacy
  10. Climate change attribution

2019 [edit]

MIT Technology Review editors invited Bill Gates to choose the 2019 listing.[44]

  1. Robot dexterity
  2. New-wave nuclear power
  3. Predicting preemies
  4. Gut probe in a pill
  5. Custom cancer vaccines
  6. The moo-cow-free burger
  7. Carbon dioxide catcher
  8. An ECG on your wrist
  9. Sanitation without sewers
  10. Smooth-talking AI assistants

2018 [edit]

Source:[45]

  1. 3-D metal printing
  2. Artificial embryos
  3. Sensing city
  4. AI for everybody
  5. Dueling neural networks
  6. Boom-boom-fish earbuds
  7. Goose egg-carbon natural gas
  8. Perfect online privacy
  9. Genetic fortune-telling
  10. Materials' quantum leap

2017 [edit]

Source:[46]

  1. Reversing paralysis
  2. Self-driving trucks
  3. Paying with your face
  4. Practical quantum computers
  5. The 360-degree selfie
  6. Hot solar cells
  7. Factor therapy two.0
  8. The cell atlas
  9. Botnets of things
  10. Reinforcement learning

2016 [edit]

Source:[47]

  1. Immune engineering science
  2. Precise gene editing in plants
  3. Conversational interfaces
  4. Reusable rockets
  5. Robots that teach each other
  6. DNA app shop
  7. SolarCity'south Gigafactory
  8. Slack
  9. Tesla Autopilot
  10. Ability from the air

2015 [edit]

Source:[48]

  1. Magic leap
  2. Nano-architecture
  3. Car-to-car communication
  4. Project Loon
  5. Liquid biopsy
  6. Megascale desalination
  7. Apple Pay
  8. Brain organoids
  9. Supercharged photosynthesis
  10. Internet of DNA

2014 [edit]

Source:[49]

  1. Agronomical drones
  2. Ultraprivate smartphones
  3. Brain mapping
  4. Neuromorphic fries
  5. Genome editing
  6. Microscale 3-D press
  7. Mobile collaboration
  8. Oculus Rift
  9. Agile robots
  10. Smart wind and solar power

2013 [edit]

Source:[50]

  1. Smart watches
  2. Ultra-efficient solar power
  3. Retentiveness implants
  4. Prenatal DNA sequencing
  5. Deep learning
  6. Additive manufacturing
  7. Big information from cheap phones
  8. Temporary social media
  9. Supergrids
  10. Baxter: the blue-collar robot

2012 [edit]

Source:[51]

  1. Egg stem cells
  2. Ultra-efficient solar
  3. Light-field photography
  4. Solar microgrids
  5. 3-D transistors
  6. A faster Fourier transform
  7. Nanopore sequencing
  8. Crowdfunding
  9. High-speed materials discovery
  10. Facebook's Timeline

2011 [edit]

Source:[52]

  1. Social ondexing
  2. Smart transformers
  3. Gestural interfaces
  4. Cancer genomics
  5. Solid-state batteries
  6. Homomorphic encryption
  7. Cloud streaming
  8. Crash-proof lawmaking
  9. Separating chromosomes
  10. Constructed cells

2010 [edit]

Source:[53]

  1. Existent-time search
  2. Mobile iii-D
  3. Engineered stalk cells
  4. Solar fuel
  5. Light-trapping photovoltaics
  6. Social TV
  7. Green concrete
  8. Implantable electronics
  9. Dual-activeness antibodies
  10. Cloud programming

2009 [edit]

Source:[54]

  1. Intelligent software banana
  2. $100 genome
  3. Racetrack memory
  4. Biological machines
  5. Paper diagnostics
  6. Liquid battery
  7. Traveling-moving ridge reactor
  8. Nanopiezoelectronics
  9. HashCache
  10. Software-defined networking

Recognition [edit]

In 2006, Technology Review was a finalist in the National Magazine Awards in the category of Full general Excellence.[55]

In 2010, Engineering science Review won the gold and argent prizes for all-time full issue of a technology magazine (for its Nov and June 2009 issues) and the aureate, silver, and statuary prizes for all-time single article in a applied science magazine (for "Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map" by David Rotman;[56] "Prescription: Networking" by David Talbot;[57] and "Chasing the Sun" by David Rotman)[58] in the Folio Mag Eddie Awards.[59]

In 2007, Engineering Review won the bronze prizes in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards in the categories of best result of a technology mag and all-time single engineering article.[60] That same year, technologyreview.com won third identify in the MPA Digital Awards for best business organisation or news Website and second identify for best online video or video serial.[61]

In 2008, Technology Review won the gold prize for the best issue of a technology magazine (for its May 2008 issue); the gold, argent, and bronze prizes for best single articles in a engineering science mag (for The Cost of Biofuels by David Rotman;[62] Encephalon Trauma in Iraq by Emily Singer;[63] and Una Laptop por Niño by David Talbot);[64] the gold prize for best online community; and the bronze prize for all-time online tool in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards.[65] That same year, Technology Review won third place in the Magazine Publishers of America (MPA) Digital Awards for all-time online videos.[66]

In 2009, Engineering Review won the gold prize for Best Online News Coverage; the gold and silver prizes for best unmarried articles in a technology magazine (for "How Obama Actually Did It" by David Talbot)[67] and "Can Technology Save the Economy?" by David Rotman[68] and the silver prize for all-time online community in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[69]

In 2011, Technology Review won the silver prize for all-time full issue of a technology magazine (for its January 2011 event) and the aureate and silver prizes for all-time single commodity in a technology magazine (for "Moore's Outlaws" by David Talbot[70] and "Radical Opacity" past Julian Dibbell)[71] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[72] That same year, Technology Review was recognized for the best science and technology coverage in the Utne Reader Independent Printing Awards.[73]

In 2012, MIT Technology Review won the gold and argent prizes for best full effect of a technology magazine (for its June and October 2012 issues), and the aureate and bronze prizes for best unmarried commodity in a technology magazine (for "People Power 2.0" past John Pollock[74] and "The Library of Utopia" past Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[76] That same year, MIT Technology Review won the gold prize for best characteristic design (for "The Library of Utopia" past Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards.[77]

Run across also [edit]

  • Citizen Scientific discipline (The OED cites an article from the MIT Technology Review in Jan 1989[78] every bit the starting time utilise of the term 'citizen science'.)

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b "MIT Technology Review names Mat Honan its new editor in chief". MIT Technology Review (Press release). July 19, 2021. Retrieved February 7, 2022. Honan starts at MIT Engineering science Review on August 17.
  2. ^ "AAM: Full Circ for Consumer Magazines". Accessabc.com. Archived from the original on 2012-06-04. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  3. ^ "Terms of Service". MIT Technology Review. August 12, 2013. Retrieved February seven, 2022. MIT Technology Review is an independent media company owned past the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
  4. ^ "Our coverage is independent of any influence, including our buying by MIT". Retrieved 2018-11-x .
  5. ^ a b c d "Atechreview". Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  6. ^ "MIT Engineering science Review". Retrieved 2021-11-05 .
  7. ^ "Utne Contained Press Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  8. ^ However, Scientific American has been published continuously since 1845, and Pop Science since 1872. In the personal communication cited above, Pontin says that the claim rests on the definition of a magazine every bit being perfect jump, Scientific American being in paper tabloid format in 1899.
  9. ^ The New York Times, January 21, 1899, page BR33.
  10. ^ Lidsky, Lawrence 1000. (October 1983). "The Problem with Fusion" (PDF). MIT Technology Review. pp. 32–44. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  11. ^ Amanda Schaffer (December 22, 2015). "Puzzle Corner'southward Keeper". MIT Engineering science Review . Retrieved February 7, 2022. Allan Gottlieb '67 has been serving upwards math challenges to alumni and friends for one-half a century.
  12. ^ The Boston Globe, July 17, 1982.
  13. ^ http://www.textfiles.com/humour/woolly_m.amm Archived Dec x, 2004, at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ Charles H. Brawl, News Office (1 February 1995). "Engineering Review rated 'most credible'". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  15. ^ Crum, Male monarch (April 13, 1998). "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  16. ^ "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Boston Business Journal . Retrieved 2015-03-thirty .
  17. ^ The Boston World, April 25, 1999 p. G1
  18. ^ The Boston Globe, April 21, 1998 p. C1 "Gloom, Doom and Boom at MIT." Warsh analogized the sometime TR with beloved departed Cambridge eateries like the F&T Cafeteria.
  19. ^ [1] Archived April 30, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ The New York Times, Nov x, 2004, p. viii, "Glossy Alumni Magazines Seek More than Graduates"
  21. ^ "MIT - offices+services". Mit.edu . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  22. ^ The Boston Globe, April 25, 1999 p. G1 "MIT Tech Magazine, On Plateau, Finds Killer App: Capitalism"
  23. ^ "Emerging Technologies Reviews".
  24. ^ Jason Pontin, personal email to Dpbsmith, August 27, 2005
  25. ^ David Rapp, Engineering science Review (28 November 2001). "Engineering science Review wins vi awards". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  26. ^ "Archived copy". searchpdffiles.com. Archived from the original on 11 February 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2022. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally championship (link)
  27. ^ Wall Street Journal Staff (2001-01-22). "Fortune, Cnet Enter Pact For Issues of Tech Reviews". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2021-03-11 . {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  28. ^ "MIT sues Fourth dimension Inc. over magazine name". Boston Business concern Journal . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  29. ^ Trademark registration 0668713, registered Oct 21, 1958 to "Alumni Association of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology" and renewed in 1999.
  30. ^ "MIT Finishes 3 Lawsuits, Initiates One During Summer". Mit.edu. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  31. ^ "Energy and Engineering Review". Llnl.gov . Retrieved 2015-03-thirty .
  32. ^ [2] Archived October 17, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  33. ^ "Nuclear Engineering Review 2004" (PDF). Iaea.org. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  34. ^ a b The Boston Globe, April 22, 2005, p. C3 "More of Author'southward Stories Faulted—MIT Says Merely iii of 10 were Authentic"
  35. ^ Jason Pontin (2005). "A Letter to MIT Alumni". Technology Review . Retrieved 2006-06-26 .
  36. ^ "You lot Become No Gotten in the New Yorker". Equally for the diareses, it's only something we practice: information technology shows yous that the second vowel is pronounced as a 2nd syllable. The New Yorker does it in this state, and it's not uncommon in the United Kingdom. There are a couple of other idiosyncratic style uses that I've been less successful in imposing on our re-create desk-bound. I'd love to insist on what'southward called "logical punctuation" in the English style, simply the moral weight of the visitor insists that 'MIT Technology Review is an American publication.' (original comment on [3] before comments were disabled)
  37. ^ "MIT Technology Review Names Gideon Lichfield Editor in Master". Technology Review. 2017. Archived from the original on 2018-11-ten. Retrieved 2019-03-13 .
  38. ^ https://mittechreview.com.br/.
  39. ^ Review, MIT Technology. "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2006 - MIT Applied science Review". Retrieved 20 September 2017.
  40. ^ "TR 100: Computing". MIT Engineering science Review . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx . [ permanent dead link ]
  41. ^ "TR 35". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved 2015-03-30 . [ permanent dead link ]
  42. ^ "10 Quantum Technologies 2021".
  43. ^ "2020".
  44. ^ "2019".
  45. ^ "2018".
  46. ^ "2017".
  47. ^ "2016".
  48. ^ "2015".
  49. ^ "2014".
  50. ^ "2013".
  51. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2012".
  52. ^ "x Breakthrough Technologies 2011".
  53. ^ "10 Quantum Technologies 2010".
  54. ^ "ten Breakthrough Technologies 2009".
  55. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-08-xix. Retrieved 2006-07-27 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally title (link)
  56. ^ "Natural Gas Changes the Free energy Map". MIT Applied science Review.
  57. ^ "Prescription: Networking". MIT Technology Review.
  58. ^ "Chasing the Sun". MIT Engineering science Review.
  59. ^ "2010 Folio: Laurels Winners Appear". Folio. 2011-01-25.
  60. ^ "The 2007 Eddie & Ozzie Award Winners". Folio. November 2007.
  61. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2007-03-06 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  62. ^ "The Price of Biofuels". MIT Technology Review.
  63. ^ "Encephalon Trauma in Iraq". MIT Technology Review.
  64. ^ "Una Laptop por Niño". MIT Technology Review.
  65. ^ "2008 Eddie Awards Winners". Folio. 2008-09-23.
  66. ^ MPA Digital Awards 2008 Archived 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Motorcar
  67. ^ "How Obama Really Did Information technology". MIT Technology Review.
  68. ^ "Tin Technology Save the Economy?". MIT Technology Review.
  69. ^ "2009 Eddie Award Winners". Folio. December 2009.
  70. ^ "Moore'due south Outlaws". MIT Technology Review.
  71. ^ "Radical Opacity". MIT Engineering Review.
  72. ^ "The 2011 Eddie and Ozzie Honor Winners". Folio. 2011-12-08.
  73. ^ "Utne Independent Press Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2011-06-08 .
  74. ^ "People Power ii.0". MIT Technology Review.
  75. ^ a b "The Library of Utopia". MIT Engineering Review.
  76. ^ "Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 2012" (PDF). technologyreview.com.
  77. ^ "Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 2012" (PDF). creative.red7media.com.
  78. ^ R. Kerson (1989). "Lab for the Surround". MIT Technology Review. Vol. 92, no. 1. pp. 11–12.

External links [edit]

  • Official website Edit this at Wikidata

bourgthowelf.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Technology_Review

Post a Comment for "Technology Review #1 Emerging Application of Technology (Consumer or Business)"